Monday, March 14, 2011

Assignment #3

This debate centres on the exploitation/abuse of children in commercial and artistic arenas and the blurring of lines between art and pornography. 


Both the work of Bill Henson and that of  the Vogue issue are as socially provocative as each other in their own ways. It is the sort of debate that can polarize a community, and generate such strong emotions and opinion that can be paralleled to the wars fought over "opposing" religious beliefs.  And similar too is that in both cases either side is fundamentally fighting for the same thing, that being an acceptable universal standard that betters mankind. Like most laws or socially enforceable ethos they need to be "written" to deal with the absolute fringe dwellers. but, as I don't consider myself part of that subset/subculture that  a value judgement itself. Who am I or anyone to decide  where that line is drawn? Furthermore this is only the strand of the debate that deals largely with  the audience of the  images and the context in which they are viewed, and the implied direct harm to the children involved that can ensue.  However as David Marr points out research has failed to conclude that viewing of such material leads to paedophilia. It is this aspect of the debate that seems to create the most hysteria and fear amongst the general public, which leads to calls for unrealistic reactionary censorship, that cannot be feasibly enforced, if for nothing else but the many exceptions that would need to be considered.


David Marr's central point returned to one of the need for calm well considered discussion, rather than panic from the public and rhetoric from the governments. As much as I agree with this notion in principle, I cannot see such a  forum being able to formulate a working solution to what is such a dilemma. 


A second aspect of the debate comes down to the rights of the children models being eroded by their innocence being commercialised and or compromised by experiences/exposures that may accelerate their childhood. Together with, (whether such images are used as parody of of culture or not), targeted distribution can influence the peers of these models to conform and fast track their maturity. 


Finally, but by no means exhaustively, there is the controversy that we as a culture are one of an unhealthy youth/beauty worship culture, and continue to push the envelope of what is the accepted bench mark of attractiveness and desirability. Perpetuating  in motion  the unrealistic goals and body images of not only our youth but also of the adult community by in large. Creating a pandemic of sorts in respect to low self esteem and social worth(less-ness) if these unattainable standards are not lived up to.
















1 comment:

  1. Yes, I agree Ashley, that the topic creates hysterical responses and as soon as that happens it is difficult to address properly. I think one of the problems central to these debates TODAY is that the distribution and control of images has changed dramatically through the internet. A good case question I think is to personalise the issues and ask how would you personally feel if your image (or that of your son/daughter) was misused or distorted etc. I guess the other point (which we will further discuss in class) is the difference between pornography and art - and I would argue that there are a number of definitive criteria to differentiate them.

    ReplyDelete